GE-Act 2.0
AgiBot Research智元机器人

GE-Act 2.0

Pretraining and Scaling a World-Action Model
for Robotic Manipulation
面向机器人操作的世界—动作模型
预训练与规模扩展

Paper论文 Code · Coming soon代码 · 即将开放
{{ filmClock }}
{{ filmLen }}
DATA UTILIZATION数据利用

Learning visual prediction and action from complementary data从互补数据中学习视觉预测与动作生成

Manipulation data provides complementary kinds of supervision. Video shows how a scene changes, often without recording the actions that caused those changes. Robot trajectories contain actions but may lack language instructions or depict unsuccessful attempts. GE-Act 2.0 uses both through separate pretraining: our single-step visual planner learns to predict future states from video, while the inverse dynamics model learns to recover actions from observed transitions. Both models are pretrained from scratch on manipulation data.机器人操作数据提供了互补的监督信息。视频记录场景如何变化,却往往没有记录引发变化的动作;机器人轨迹包含动作,但可能缺少语言指令,也可能来自失败尝试。GE-Act 2.0 通过独立预训练利用这两类数据:单步视觉规划器从视频中学习预测未来状态,逆动力学模型则从观测到的状态转移中学习恢复动作。两个模型均在操作数据上从零开始预训练。

The two components are then connected through predicted visual futures. Knowledge-aligned selective optimization (KASO) selects predictions compatible with the recorded actions, allowing joint training to build on what each component has learned. We scale this co-training stage and measure the capabilities present before downstream adaptation.随后,我们通过预测的未来视觉状态连接这两个模块。知识对齐选择性优化(KASO)筛选与记录动作相容的预测,使联合训练能够延续各模块在独立预训练中获得的能力。我们扩展这一协同训练阶段的数据规模,并评估模型在下游适配之前已具备的能力。

Action-free dataVideo with instructions, no actions.
PRETRAINS · SVPSingle-step Visual PlannerPredicts future visual states.
Fully labeled dataVideo, instructions and actions.
Instruction-free dataRobot trajectories, no instructions.
PRETRAINS · IDMInverse dynamicsRecovers the action between two states.
CO-TRAINING · KASOGE-Act 2.0Planner and action model connected through predicted futures.
DATA SCALING数据规模扩展

Scaling Zero-Shot Manipulation Skills零样本操作技能随数据规模提升

We evaluate pretrained checkpoints directly on G1-OP and G2-90D, which contribute more than 50% and less than 2% of the co-training data, respectively. Evaluation follows a zero-shot, out-of-distribution (OOD) protocol, without task- or embodiment-specific fine-tuning, using new object instances, scenes, backgrounds and lighting conditions not seen during pretraining or co-training.我们将预训练检查点直接部署到 G1-OP 和 G2-90D 上进行评估,二者分别占协同训练数据的 50% 以上和不足 2%。评估遵循零样本、分布外协议,不做任务或本体专属微调,使用预训练和协同训练中均未出现的新物体实例、场景、背景和光照条件。

We scale manipulation data through four nested pools of 300, 1,200, 5,000 and 30,000 hours, using the same pretrained components and training recipe. Each checkpoint is evaluated on 100 tasks across 20 skill groups on both embodiments, allowing us to examine how performance scales with shared training data on both a well-represented and a sparsely represented robot. The recordings show the 30,000-hour model; the task wall traces performance across all four scales.我们使用四个逐级包含的数据集,将操作数据规模扩展至 300、1,200、5,000 和 30,000 小时,各组实验采用相同的预训练模块和训练方案。每个检查点均在两个本体上评估20 类技能中的 100 项任务,从而考察在数据充足与数据稀缺的机器人上,性能如何随共享训练数据规模变化。下方视频展示 30,000 小时模型的执行表现,任务墙展示四个数据规模下的成功率。

{{ rollTag }} {{ rollHint }}
{{ r.name }}
{{ t.fam }} {{ t.label }}
columns = 0.3k · 1.2k · 5k · 30k 0 → 100% of ten trials ▶ = click to watch the recording
{{ fam.name }}
{{ tk.label }}
The wall shows G1-OP success at all four co-training scales. Hover a task for its instruction; rows marked ▶ open a recording. Each cell summarizes ten trials, in 10-percentage-point increments. The videos illustrate individual executions.任务墙展示 G1-OP 在四个协同训练数据规模下的成功率。悬停可查看任务指令,点击带 ▶ 标记的任务可观看对应视频。每个单元格汇总 10 次试验,成功率以 10 个百分点为一个刻度。视频展示单次执行过程。

Increasing co-training from 300 to 30,000 hours raises mean success from 17.1% to 44.1% on G1-OP and from 13.4% to 31.1% on G2-90D. The gains extend across nineteen of twenty skill groups on G1-OP and eighteen on G2-90D. The number of tasks with nonzero success grows from 39 to 76 and from 24 to 72, respectively, with further improvement between 5,000 and 30,000 hours.将协同训练数据从 300 小时扩展到 30,000 小时后,G1-OP 的平均成功率从 17.1% 提升至 44.1%,G2-90D 从 13.4% 提升至 31.1%。提升覆盖了 G1-OP 的 19 类技能和 G2-90D 的 18 类技能,评估共包含 20 类技能。至少成功过一次的任务数分别从 39 项增加到 76 项、从 24 项增加到 72 项;从 5,000 小时扩展到 30,000 小时后,性能仍在继续提升。

Even with less than 2% of the co-training data, G2-90D gains 17.7 percentage points as the shared corpus scales, suggesting useful cross-embodiment transfer from the broader training data. At the largest scale, ten skill groups have fewer than five hours of G2-90D data each, including four with less than one hour. Scaling also expands the manipulation repertoire, with skills such as straightening and separating objects emerging on G1-OP at 30,000 hours.尽管在协同训练数据中的占比不足 2%,G2-90D 的成功率仍随共享数据规模扩大而提升了 17.7 个百分点,表明更广泛的训练数据可能带来有效的跨本体迁移。在最大数据规模下,G2-90D 有 10 类技能的数据量各不足 5 小时,其中 4 类各不足 1 小时。数据扩展也拓宽了模型的操作技能范围:G1-OP 在 30,000 小时规模下开始成功完成扶正、分离物体等技能。

G1-OPdominant embodiment (>50% of pretraining corpus)主导本体(占预训练数据 >50%)17.1 → 44.1%G2-90Drare embodiment (<2% of pretraining corpus)稀有本体(占预训练数据 <2%)13.4 → 31.1%
{{ scaleTag }}
0 20 40 60 300 1,200 5,000 30,000 Co-training data (hours, log scale) Mean task success (%) 17.1 22.6 27.3 44.1 13.4 21.0 23.5 31.1
One pretrained checkpoint per scale, deployed without task-specific fine-tuning. Points are measured suite means; lines connect the four evaluated pools.每个数据规模对应一个预训练检查点,部署时不进行任务专属微调。数据点表示实测的任务集平均成功率,连线连接四个已评估的数据规模。
{{ p.name }} {{ p.end }} / {{ p.end2 }}
Each panel shows one skill group: mean success across 0.3k → 1.2k → 5k → 30k hours for both embodiments, ordered by hours of that skill in the mixture. Four points support a comparison, not a fit; no extrapolation beyond 30,000 hours is implied.每个面板展示一类技能在两个本体上的平均成功率,数据规模依次为 300、1,200、5,000 和 30,000 小时。技能按其在训练数据中的小时数排序。四个数据点用于比较不同规模的表现,不进行曲线拟合,也不外推 30,000 小时以上的结果。
Evaluation protocol. Ten trials per task, embodiment and scale, with predefined success criteria. We use the last checkpoint and fixed deployment settings, without prompt tuning or per-task checkpoint selection. G1-OP and G2-90D are two entirely different robots, so scaling is compared within each embodiment.评估协议。 每项任务在每个本体、每个数据规模下均进行 10 次试验,并使用预先定义的成功标准。我们使用最后一个检查点和固定的部署设置,不针对任务调整提示词或选择检查点。G1-OP 与 G2-90D 是两款完全不同的机器人,规模扩展效果在各本体内部进行比较。
INSTRUCTION FOLLOWING指令跟随

Following Language Instructions遵循语言指令

Under the same zero-shot OOD protocol, we evaluate GE-Act 2.0’s instruction grounding across object identity, colour, size, shape, position and order. The demonstrations highlight precise object selection in cluttered scenes, adherence to instructions that conflict with learned action biases, and generalization to new tasks through instruction composition.在同一零样本、分布外评估协议下,我们从物体类别、颜色、尺寸、形状、位置和顺序六个维度评估 GE-Act 2.0 的指令指代解析能力。下方演示重点展示在杂乱场景中精确选取物体、遵循与已学动作偏好相冲突的指令,以及通过指令组合泛化到新任务。

Selecting Objects by Instruction按指令选择物体

GE-Act 2.0 selects the requested object among distractors in a cluttered scene. The first set varies the target object while keeping the scene and initial robot state fixed. The second uses richer pick-and-place instructions, combining object and colour references to specify what to move and where to place it.GE-Act 2.0 能在杂乱场景中从干扰物里选出指令指定的物体。第一组示例在场景和机器人初始状态不变的情况下改变目标物体;第二组使用更丰富的取放指令,结合物体与颜色指代来指定移动什么、放到哪里。

OBJECT IDENTITY Select the requested object in a cluttered scene.
{{ v.caption }}
COMBINING OBJECT AND COLOUR REFERENCES Grounding objects and destinations across successive commands.
{{ c.caption }}

Following Instructions Against Learned Action Biases遵循指令,克服习得的动作偏置

Training data links visual states to familiar actions: when a gripper has approached an object, the next action is usually to grasp that same object; a shoe beside a shoebox suggests placing the shoe inside. These demonstrations test whether an explicit instruction can override those learned associations—redirecting the reach toward a different object or placing a cup into the shoebox.训练数据将视觉状态与常见动作关联起来:当夹爪已经接近一个物体时,接下来的动作通常是抓取该物体;鞋子放在鞋盒旁时,则容易让模型联想到将鞋子放入鞋盒。这些演示检验显式指令能否覆盖已学到的关联,例如将正在进行的伸手动作转向另一个物体,或将杯子放入鞋盒。

{{ m.tag }}
{{ m.cueText }}
{{ m.title }} {{ m.text }}

Task Generalization Through Instruction Composition通过指令组合实现任务泛化

GE-Act 2.0 demonstrates zero-shot generalization to novel long-horizon tasks in out-of-distribution scenes by accurately following successive single-step instructions. Through language guidance, it composes familiar manipulation skills into new task sequences, without task-specific fine-tuning.GE-Act 2.0 通过精确执行连续的单步指令,在分布外场景中展现出对全新长时序任务的零样本泛化能力。在语言指令的引导下,它将已掌握的操作技能组合成新的任务序列,且无需任务专属微调。

GOAL {{ lhMergedText }} {{ lhCount }}
{{ s.n }}{{ s.text }}
ARCHITECTURE模型架构

GE-Act 2.0 ArchitectureGE-Act 2.0 架构

GE-Act 2.0 turns an instruction into action through three components in sequence. The control-oriented autoencoder (CoAE) maps camera observations into a compact latent space. The single-step visual planner (SVP) predicts future states in that space, conditioned on the instruction and current observation. An inverse dynamics model (IDM) reads the predicted future together with the current latents and proprioception to produce an action chunk.GE-Act 2.0 通过三个依次连接的模块将指令转化为动作。面向控制的自编码器(CoAE)将相机观测映射到紧凑的潜在空间;单步视觉规划器(SVP)以当前观测和指令为条件,在该空间中预测未来状态;逆动力学模型(IDM)结合预测的未来、当前视觉潜变量与本体感知信息,生成动作片段。

The future sequence covers two timescales: dense visual states over the immediate action horizon and sparse states extending to the end of the task. The IDM uses the full sequence for context, but the robot executes only the dense action chunk. Sparse far-horizon action predictions provide auxiliary supervision during training. This keeps the immediate control output connected to the visual outcome of the broader task.未来状态序列覆盖两种时间尺度:近期动作执行范围内的密集视觉状态,以及延伸至任务结束的稀疏视觉状态。IDM 使用完整序列提供的上下文,但机器人仅执行密集动作片段。远期稀疏动作预测在训练中提供辅助监督,将即时控制与整个任务的视觉结果联系起来。

CONDITIONING
head-view observation “put the bowl in the sink”
HOVER A STAGE
① OBSERVE CoAE encoder
leftfrontright
Multi-view frames → 24 control-aware tokens per frame.
② PREDICT · SVP Single-step visual planner
one step
t = 1
r = 0
Frozen VLM grounds the instruction in the head view; DiT × N.
③ FUTURE Predicted vision states
nowtask end
Dense over the action horizon, sparse to task end.
④ ACT · IDM Inverse dynamics
executedtraining target
Only the dense chunk is executed; sparse actions train.
ACTION GRADIENT
The solid path runs at deployment. The dashed gradient path exists only during co-training; which generated futures it trains on is the subject of KASO, below. Hover, focus or tap a stage for detail.实线路径用于部署。虚线梯度路径仅在协同训练时使用;哪些生成的未来状态参与动作训练,由下文的 KASO 决定。悬停、聚焦或点击各阶段可查看说明。
CoAE · CONTROL-ORIENTED AUTOENCODERCoAE · 面向控制的自编码器

A Control-Oriented Latent Space面向控制的潜在空间

A useful visual representation must preserve the information required to predict both future states and actions. CoAE compresses each 256 × 384 camera frame into just 24 latent tokens, using 64× spatial downsampling. This reduces the sequence length processed by the visual planner while retaining a pixel decoder for inspecting predicted futures.有效的视觉表征需要保留预测未来状态和动作所需的信息。CoAE 使用 64 倍空间下采样,将每张 256 × 384 的相机图像压缩为仅 24 个潜在 token,减少视觉规划器处理的序列长度。同时保留像素解码器,使预测的未来状态能够还原为图像并被检查。

Reconstruction alone does not explicitly organize the representation around manipulation. CoAE therefore adds three alignment heads alongside its reconstruction objective. They match frozen features from SigLIP 2 for semantics, V-JEPA 2.1 for motion and DINOv3 for dense visual structure. These complementary targets encourage the compressed latents to retain information that visual planning and action recovery need.仅依靠重建目标,无法显式地使表征围绕操作任务组织信息。因此,CoAE 在重建目标之外加入三个对齐头,分别匹配冻结的 SigLIP 2 语义特征、V-JEPA 2.1 运动特征和 DINOv3 密集视觉结构特征。这些互补目标促使压缩后的潜变量保留视觉规划与动作恢复所需的信息。

COAE · TRAINING
One encoder, one decoder, three alignment heads一个编码器、一个解码器、三个对齐头
TEACHERS FROZEN · SAME INPUT FRAMES教师模型冻结 · 同一输入帧
INPUTVideo frames
ENCODERCoAE encoder
LATENTz · 512 channels64 × 64 compression
PIXELSReconstruction decoderpixel · perceptual · adversarial
OUTPUTReconstructed frame
SEMANTICSSemantic headcosine alignment
FROZEN TEACHERSigLIP 2semantics
MOTIONMotion headcosine alignment
FROZEN TEACHERV-JEPA 2.1motion
STRUCTUREStructural headcosine alignment
FROZEN TEACHERDINOv3dense structure
The encoder maps each frame to a 4 × 6 grid of 512-channel latents, one token per 64 × 64 pixels. A reconstruction decoder supplies pixel-level supervision, while three alignment heads match frozen-teacher features for semantics, motion and dense structure.编码器将每帧映射为 4 × 6 的潜变量网格,每个位置包含 512 个通道,每个 token 对应 64 × 64 像素区域。重建解码器提供像素级监督,三个对齐头分别匹配冻结教师模型的语义、运动和密集结构特征。

We evaluate the frozen representation with identical probes across encoders. CoAE retains useful action information with one-sixteenth of the tokens used by DINOv3 and V-JEPA 2.1, although its action-recovery error is 13–31% higher. In the simulation caption-matching probe, CoAE achieves 97.95% accuracy. These probes test what the latent space preserves; they are separate from the on-robot task evaluation and do not supply training gradients.我们使用相同的探针设置评估各个冻结的视觉编码器。CoAE 使用的 token 数仅为 DINOv3 和 V-JEPA 2.1 的十六分之一,同时保留了有效的动作信息,其动作恢复误差比二者高 13–31%。在仿真场景的描述匹配探针中,CoAE 达到 97.95% 的准确率。这些探针用于检验潜在空间保留的信息,独立于真实机器人的任务评估,也不向被评估的表征提供训练梯度。

SVP · SINGLE-STEP VISUAL PLANNERSVP · 单步视觉规划器

Single-Step Generation Enables Separate Pretraining单步生成支持独立预训练

The connection between visual prediction and inverse dynamics must remain trainable. A conventional multi-step generator produces a completed future after a sequence of denoising passes. Backpropagating an action loss through that future requires differentiating through the generation chain. Coupling action prediction to intermediate generator features can avoid this chain, but ties action learning to the generator’s internal representation.视觉预测与逆动力学之间的连接需要支持梯度传播。传统多步生成器经过一系列去噪步骤后,才能得到完整的未来状态;若要通过该预测反向传播动作损失,就需要对整条生成链求导。让动作预测依赖生成器的中间特征可以绕过这条链,但也使动作学习与生成器的内部表征绑定。

SVP instead generates the complete future latent sequence in one differentiable MeanFlow pass. The IDM can first learn from actual observed transitions as a standalone model, then connect to completed predictions through the same input interface. During co-training, the action loss passes through the IDM into the planner, allowing both components to adapt to the connection.SVP 在一次可微的 MeanFlow 前向计算中生成完整的未来潜变量序列。IDM 因此可以先作为独立模型,从真实观测到的状态转移中学习,再通过相同的输入接口接入完整的预测结果。在协同训练中,动作损失经过 IDM 传回视觉规划器,使两个模块共同适应这一连接。

MULTI-STEP GENERATOR · K DENOISING PASSES
ε future
action gradient: back through every step K sequential generation passes

A completed future lies at the end of the denoising chain. Differentiating an action loss through that future traverses the generation passes.完整的未来状态位于去噪链的末端。通过该预测反向传播动作损失,需要对所有生成步骤求导。

SVP · ONE MEANFLOW PASS
ε SVP · u(ε, 1, 0) complete future IDM
action gradient: one boundary to cross 1 generation pass

A completed future is available in one pass. The independently pretrained IDM connects to it, and the action loss can update both modules.一次前向计算即可获得完整的未来状态。独立预训练的 IDM 接入该预测后,动作损失可以同时更新两个模块。

The pretraining mixtures reflect the modules’ different supervision requirements: SVP uses 39,000 hours and IDM uses 32,000 hours. These are distinct from the 30,000-hour largest co-training pool used in the scaling study. A frozen vision-language model grounds the instruction in the head-camera observation, while SVP learns to generate multi-view futures in CoAE’s latent space.两个模块的预训练数据体现了各自的监督需求:SVP 使用 39,000 小时数据,IDM 使用 32,000 小时数据。这两个预训练数据集不同于规模扩展实验中最大的 30,000 小时协同训练数据集。冻结的视觉—语言模型结合头部相机观测解析指令,SVP 则学习在 CoAE 的潜在空间中生成多视角未来状态。

Single-step generation provides a further property needed for selective training: a predicted future is deterministic given its conditioning and sampled noise. We can evaluate several candidates without retaining their training graphs, keep the noise of a selected candidate, and reproduce that exact prediction with gradients. KASO uses this replay to decide which futures carry action supervision.单步生成还提供了选择性训练所需的一项性质:给定条件输入和采样噪声,预测的未来状态是确定的。我们可以在不保留训练计算图的情况下评估多个候选,保存选中候选的噪声,再带梯度精确重现该预测。KASO 利用这一重放机制决定哪些未来状态接受动作监督。

THE VALIDITY GAP · KASOKASO · 有效性缺口

Aligning Visual Futures with Action Supervision将未来视觉预测与动作监督对齐

A correct visual prediction is not automatically compatible with a recorded action. Given the same scene and instruction, a robot may complete a task in several valid ways. A generated future may depict one completion while the demonstration records another. Training the IDM on that future with the recorded action asks it to learn from a mismatched pair.正确的视觉预测并不一定与记录的动作相容。面对相同场景和指令,机器人可能以多种有效方式完成任务;生成的未来状态可能对应其中一种,而示范记录的是另一种。将这样的未来预测与记录动作配对训练,会让 IDM 接收到不匹配的监督。

We term this supervision mismatch the validity gap. Improving visual plausibility alone does not ensure that an independently generated future describes the behavior in the recording. Knowledge-aligned selective optimization (KASO) addresses the connection directly: it generates several candidate futures and selects those whose implied actions are compatible with the recorded behavior.我们将这种监督不匹配称为“有效性缺口”。仅提高视觉预测的真实性,并不能保证独立生成的未来状态与记录中的行为一致。知识对齐选择性优化(KASO)直接处理这一问题:生成多个候选未来,并选择其中所隐含动作与记录行为相容的候选。

{{ actLabel }}
{{ phaseTitle }}
{{ phaseCounter }}
{{ kasoRailLabel }}
NOISE DRAWS
{{ c.label }}
SVP One-step flow generator {{ wmMode }}
CANDIDATE FUTURES
{{ ln.zText }}
IDM Inverse dynamics {{ probeBadge }}
DISAGREEMENT
vreffarther →
{{ ln.vText }} {{ ln.tag }}
recorded video z

{{ explainer }}

KASO first probes the active IDM with each candidate and with the recorded video, using a shared action noise at a fixed high-noise flow time. It ranks candidates by the difference between their IDM responses and the recorded-video response. The comparison is made in action space, so visually different futures can remain compatible when they imply the same behavior.KASO 首先在固定的高噪声流时间点,以相同的动作噪声,分别用各候选未来和记录视频作为条件查询当前 IDM。候选根据其 IDM 响应与记录视频对应响应之间的差异排序。比较在动作空间中进行,因此视觉上不同的未来状态,只要对应相同的行为,也可以被判定为相容。

The lowest-energy candidate is selected in the default configuration. Its retained noise reproduces the scored future, now with gradients, and a fresh action-noise and time sample supplies the training loss. That loss updates both IDM and SVP. Selection is recomputed at each optimizer step, rather than being a one-time filter over a generated dataset.默认配置选择能量最低的候选。保存的噪声用于带梯度重现被评分的未来状态,再使用新采样的动作噪声和时间点计算训练损失。该损失同时更新 IDM 和 SVP。候选选择在每个优化步骤重新进行,而非对生成的数据集只做一次筛选。

A controlled real-robot ablation tests this alignment stage on G2-90D. Every variant starts from the same full-scale pretrained components and uses the same 300-hour connection-stage mixture, including 30 hours from G2-90D. KASO and E2E+PT tie on following in the four-object scene, while KASO converts more correct contacts into completed picks. The chart reports this alignment-stage experiment, rather than final-model performance.我们在 G2-90D 上通过受控的真实机器人消融实验检验这一对齐阶段。所有变体从相同的完整预训练模块初始化,并使用相同的 300 小时连接阶段数据,其中包括 30 小时 G2-90D 数据。在四物体场景中,KASO 与 E2E+PT 的指令跟随得分相同,但 KASO 能将更多正确的目标接触转化为成功抓取。下图展示的是对齐阶段实验结果,独立于最终模型的性能评估。

{{ l.name }}
Single-object scene n=25 · no distractors
Pick success
50250
12
12
40
Four-object scene macro average over four targets · 10 trials each
Follow score
100500
87.5
95
95
Pick success
50250
27.5
22.5
37.5
Follow score measures whether the robot contacts the instructed target without contacting a distractor; pick success additionally requires completing the pickup. Four-object results are macro averages over four targets, with 10 trials per target. All variants use the same 300-hour mixture, including 30 hours from G2-90D, without evaluation-specific fine-tuning. No single-object follow score is reported: with no distractors present, the metric is not meaningful.指令跟随得分衡量机器人是否接触了指令指定的目标,且未接触干扰物;抓取成功率进一步要求完成抓取。四物体结果为四个目标的宏平均值,每个目标评估 10 次。所有变体使用相同的 300 小时数据,其中包括 30 小时 G2-90D 数据,且不针对评估任务微调。单物体场景没有干扰物,因此不报告指令跟随得分。

GE-Act 2.0 shows that scaling manipulation data produces broad improvements in zero-shot, out-of-distribution performance across manipulation skills, with gains extending to an embodiment sparsely represented in the shared training data. The model also demonstrates fine-grained instruction grounding and follows explicit commands even when they conflict with an ongoing action or a familiar scene association. Together, these findings establish GE-Act 2.0 as a scalable approach to learning transferable manipulation capabilities through world-action pretraining.GE-Act 2.0 表明,扩大操作数据规模能够在各类操作技能上带来广泛的零样本、分布外性能提升,且这种提升同样延伸到在共享训练数据中占比很少的本体。模型还表现出细粒度的指令理解能力:即使指令与正在进行的动作或场景中惯常的关联相冲突,也能按照明确指令执行。这些结果共同表明,GE-Act 2.0 是一条通过世界—动作预训练学习可迁移操作能力的可扩展路径。

CITATION引用

GE-Act 2.0: Pretraining and Scaling a World-Action Model for Robotic ManipulationGE-Act 2.0:面向机器人操作的世界—动作模型预训练与规模扩展

AgiBot Research, 2026. Technical report.智元机器人,2026。技术报告。

BIBTEX
{{ bib }}
DRAFT CHECKLIST · NOT FOR PUBLICATION
{{ c }}
{{ lightCueText }}
{{ lightCaption }} {{ lightMeta }}